<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Visual brand vigilance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.colthart.com/2008/07/visual-brand-vigilance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.colthart.com/2008/07/visual-brand-vigilance/</link>
	<description>What Bruce thinks you should know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:17:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Dunn</title>
		<link>http://blog.colthart.com/2008/07/visual-brand-vigilance/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.colthart.com/?p=61#comment-91</guid>
		<description>I get what you&#039;re saying here. 

And on the compromises with clients issue, yes, a few finished pieces were substandard enough that we didn&#039;t want our business name connected to them. 

A world full of Apples? Hmmm. Wouldn&#039;t that be cool?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get what you&#8217;re saying here. </p>
<p>And on the compromises with clients issue, yes, a few finished pieces were substandard enough that we didn&#8217;t want our business name connected to them. </p>
<p>A world full of Apples? Hmmm. Wouldn&#8217;t that be cool?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce colthart</title>
		<link>http://blog.colthart.com/2008/07/visual-brand-vigilance/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce colthart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.colthart.com/?p=61#comment-90</guid>
		<description>I like the disclaimer idea. I have many many printed samples of past design work that I can&#039;t bear to show, either because of the heartbreaking compromises with the client at the 11th hour, or because the content and the design just aren&#039;t in sync.

I fully agree that defects, like the ones I was illustrating, are more glaring to creatives who are trained observers. But just as poor grammar or sentence structure might not interfere with the a letter&#039;s actual message, poor &lt;i&gt;formatting&lt;/i&gt; just as surely will erode the most carefully constructed corporate image.

I also tell clients that ultimately, your brand is only as good as its weakest link. I remember contracting a tradesman who sent an employee to work in our house who got chatty with my wife, telling her about all his trouble with his parole officer... 

Okay, apples and oranges... but I&#039;m willing to bet that an organization with a letterhead-formatting blind spot is also a little sloppy in other areas that could be addressed with usage guidelines.

Have you ever seen something that sloppy come out of Apple? Their image is supremely important to them. Few of us are that finicky, but imagine a world where we were!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the disclaimer idea. I have many many printed samples of past design work that I can&#8217;t bear to show, either because of the heartbreaking compromises with the client at the 11th hour, or because the content and the design just aren&#8217;t in sync.</p>
<p>I fully agree that defects, like the ones I was illustrating, are more glaring to creatives who are trained observers. But just as poor grammar or sentence structure might not interfere with the a letter&#8217;s actual message, poor <i>formatting</i> just as surely will erode the most carefully constructed corporate image.</p>
<p>I also tell clients that ultimately, your brand is only as good as its weakest link. I remember contracting a tradesman who sent an employee to work in our house who got chatty with my wife, telling her about all his trouble with his parole officer&#8230; </p>
<p>Okay, apples and oranges&#8230; but I&#8217;m willing to bet that an organization with a letterhead-formatting blind spot is also a little sloppy in other areas that could be addressed with usage guidelines.</p>
<p>Have you ever seen something that sloppy come out of Apple? Their image is supremely important to them. Few of us are that finicky, but imagine a world where we were!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Dunn</title>
		<link>http://blog.colthart.com/2008/07/visual-brand-vigilance/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.colthart.com/?p=61#comment-89</guid>
		<description>How awful to see the ways they can degrade our work. 

With our first business, Cat&#039;s Eye Group, clients would typically spring for the design of a brochure or web site (that would be my husband and business partner&#039;s area of expertise) and decide, &quot;Oh I can do the writing myself.&quot; (IOf course, that was my area.)

 WHY do they always think they can do the writing themselves? Ah, but I digress. 

I wanted Bob to put a disclaimer on the back that said, &quot;Copywriting NOT by Cat&#039;s Eye.&quot; Never could talk the client into that. 

I think what strikes me here, Bruce, is that those defects are always more glaring to us, the creative artists, than the consuming public. They&#039;re more interested in the content of the letter and the dispute between Company A and Company B.

I loved your mark-up, though!  Very funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How awful to see the ways they can degrade our work. </p>
<p>With our first business, Cat&#8217;s Eye Group, clients would typically spring for the design of a brochure or web site (that would be my husband and business partner&#8217;s area of expertise) and decide, &#8220;Oh I can do the writing myself.&#8221; (IOf course, that was my area.)</p>
<p> WHY do they always think they can do the writing themselves? Ah, but I digress. </p>
<p>I wanted Bob to put a disclaimer on the back that said, &#8220;Copywriting NOT by Cat&#8217;s Eye.&#8221; Never could talk the client into that. </p>
<p>I think what strikes me here, Bruce, is that those defects are always more glaring to us, the creative artists, than the consuming public. They&#8217;re more interested in the content of the letter and the dispute between Company A and Company B.</p>
<p>I loved your mark-up, though!  Very funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

